Adam Clemente
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 5
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 1
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 5
- Co-authors
- Karen Caeyenberghs (7 shared papers)Peter H. Wilson (7 shared papers)Helena Verhelst (1 shared paper)Phoebe Imms (6 shared papers)Derek K. Jones (2 shared papers)Mark Cook (1 shared paper)Wendyl D’Souza (1 shared paper)Govinda Poudel (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2 papers)Brain Structure and Function (1 paper)Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (1 paper)Network Neuroscience (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Adam Clemente
11 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Cognitive Neuroscience 152
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 82
- Epidemiology 92
- Neurology 26
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Clemente
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Clemente's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Clemente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Clemente more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Clemente
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Clemente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Clemente. The network helps show where Adam Clemente may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Clemente, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 0 |
About Adam Clemente
Adam Clemente is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 12 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper), Coffee research and impacts (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (152 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (82 citations), Epidemiology (92 citations), Neurology (26 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (18 citations). Adam Clemente has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Caeyenberghs, Peter H. Wilson, Helena Verhelst, Phoebe Imms, Derek K. Jones, Mark Cook, Wendyl D’Souza, Govinda Poudel, Juan F. Domínguez D and Darren R. Hocking. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Brain Structure and Function, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, Network Neuroscience and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.