Phillip Sanger

53 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

Phillip Sanger
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Architecture 20
  • Condensed Matter Physics 83
  • Media Technology 45
  • Biomedical Engineering 199
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 150
Replace Enrico Gianfranco Campari with:
Enrico Gianfranco Campari Italy
J.R. Yeargan United States
F. Rizzo Italy
H. Yamamoto Japan
Emily Allen United States
Petru Andrei United States
Yih-Fong Tzeng Taiwan
Seulki Roh South Korea
Jun Cheol Bae South Korea
Poul‐Erik Hansen Denmark
Phillip Sanger relative to Enrico Gianfranco Campari Italy Enrico Gianfranco Campari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Enrico Gianfranco Campari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Sanger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Sanger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Sanger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Sanger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Sanger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Sanger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Sanger. The network helps show where Phillip Sanger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip Sanger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip Sanger Line = papers co-authored together Phillip Sanger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015126
2 199848
3 197947
4 199036
5 197431
6 201425
7 200020
8 198914
9 201112
10 199810
11
Westinghouse design of a forced flow Nb3Sn test coil for the Large Coil Program
19799
12 20169
13 19989
14 20118
15 19978
16 19978
17 19818
18 19996
19 20006
20 19976

About Phillip Sanger

Phillip Sanger is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Media Technology, Architecture and Education, having authored 56 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (13 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (12 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (11 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (8 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers), Multilevel Inverters and Converters (5 papers), Educational Innovations and Challenges (5 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (20 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (83 citations), Media Technology (45 citations), Biomedical Engineering (199 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (150 citations). Phillip Sanger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Julia Ziyatdinova, Teresa Conner‐Kerr, Benjamin Long, Martín Tanaka, Nicholas A. Vavalle, Michael D. Young, Jessica L. Sparks, Anant Agarwal, Herman K. Hemmes and R. Griessen. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Solid-State Electronics, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact