Philipp Sterner
Impact in
-
- Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Papers in
-
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing 4
- Multi-Criteria Decision Making 1
-
- Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques 4
- Co-authors
- David Goretzko (9 shared papers)Florian Pargent (3 shared papers)Dominik Deffner (1 shared paper)Kim De Roover (1 shared paper)Alexander Hapfelmeier (1 shared paper)Ramona Schoedel (1 shared paper)André Kerber (1 shared paper)Peter Henningsen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal (4 papers)Psychometrika (1 paper)BMC Psychology (1 paper)Assessment (1 paper)JAMA Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsBelgium
In The Last Decade
Philipp Sterner
9 papers receiving 239 citations
Philipp Sterner's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Business and International Management 9
- Applied Psychology 8
- Social Psychology 30
- Marketing 13
- Information Systems and Management 10
Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Sterner
This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Sterner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Sterner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Sterner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Sterner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Sterner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Sterner. The network helps show where Philipp Sterner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Sterner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluating Model Fit of Measurement Models in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 202 |
| 2 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 |
About Philipp Sterner
Philipp Sterner is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Information Systems, having authored 14 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (1 paper), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper) and Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (9 citations), Applied Psychology (8 citations), Social Psychology (30 citations), Marketing (13 citations) and Information Systems and Management (10 citations). Philipp Sterner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include David Goretzko, Florian Pargent, Dominik Deffner, Kim De Roover, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Ramona Schoedel, André Kerber, Peter Henningsen, Sabine Christiane Herpertz and Markus Bühner. Their work appears in journals such as Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, Psychometrika, BMC Psychology, Assessment and JAMA Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.