Philipp Höck

846 citations
33 papers · 672 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Philipp Höck

30 papers receiving 655 citations

Peers

Philipp Höck
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Human-Computer Interaction 282
  • Social Psychology 425
  • Automotive Engineering 150
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 111
  • Safety Research 52
Replace Susanne Stadler with:
Susanne Stadler Austria
Sowmya Somanath Canada
Tuomo Kujala Finland
Roman Vilimek Germany
Oskar Palinko Denmark
Colleen Emmenegger United States
David R. Large United Kingdom
Brian Mok United States
Andreas Löcken Germany
David Miller United States
Philipp Höck relative to Susanne Stadler Austria Susanne Stadler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Susanne Stadler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Höck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Höck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Höck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Höck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Höck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Höck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Höck. The network helps show where Philipp Höck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Höck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Höck Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Höck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017117
2 201673
3 201554
4 201654
5 201751
6 201841
7 201636
8 202133
9 202228
10 201624
11 202222
12 202218
13 202118
14 202117
15 202215
16 201712
17 202211
18 20218
19 20247
20 20216

About Philipp Höck

Philipp Höck is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Automotive Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 33 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (18 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (12 papers), Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (9 papers), AI in Service Interactions (7 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (282 citations), Social Psychology (425 citations), Automotive Engineering (150 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (111 citations) and Safety Research (52 citations). Philipp Höck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Martin Baumann, Enrico Rukzio, Marcel Walch, Johannes Kraus, Franziska Babel, Jan Gugenheimer, David Dobbelstein, Michael Weber, Andrea Vogt and Tina Seufert. Their work appears in journals such as Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, British Journal of Educational Technology, International Journal of Social Robotics, Computers & Education and Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact