Philip Temby

15 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Philip Temby
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 182
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 66
  • Social Psychology 244
  • Applied Psychology 51
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 84
Replace Michael T. Chapman with:
Michael T. Chapman Australia
Robin L. J. Lines Australia
Nicole Gravina United States
Jessica L. Ford United States
Stephen P. Gonzalez United States
Miguel Á. López-Gajardo Spain
Inmaculada González‐Ponce Spain
Andrew Cruickshank United Kingdom
Mario S. Staller Germany
Jason D. Way United States
Philip Temby relative to Michael T. Chapman Australia Michael T. Chapman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Michael T. Chapman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Temby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Temby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Temby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Temby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Temby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Temby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Temby. The network helps show where Philip Temby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Philip Temby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Temby Line = papers co-authored together Philip Temby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2014288
2 2018100
3 201874
4 202033
5 202113
6 202112
7 202111
8 20138
9 20226
10 20225
11 20223
12 20193
13 20222
14 20221
15
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Game-Based Training: A Controlled Study with Dismounted Infantry Teams
20131
16 20171
17 20260

About Philip Temby

Philip Temby is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (4 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (2 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (1 paper), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (182 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (66 citations), Social Psychology (244 citations), Applied Psychology (51 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (84 citations). Philip Temby has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Daniel F. Gucciardi, Sheldon Hanton, Sandy Gordon, Clifford J. Mallett, Michael T. Chapman, Peter Peeling, Kagan J. Ducker, Monique F. Crane, Nikos Ntoumanis and Sharon K. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology, Journal of science and medicine in sport, Work & Stress, Military Psychology and Journal of Personality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact