Philip Sumner

894 citations
42 papers · 566 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Sumner

39 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Philip Sumner
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 256
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 180
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 103
  • Clinical Psychology 140
Replace Natasha Lowery with:
Natasha Lowery United States
Madiha Shaikh United Kingdom
Bianca Besteher Germany
Jacques Pellet France
Elizabeth Squires‐Wheeler United States
Alison Merikangas United States
Junko Shinoda Japan
Robert Olbrich Germany
Ernest Tyburski Poland
James R. Merikangas United States
Philip Sumner relative to Natasha Lowery United States Natasha Lowery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Natasha Lowery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Sumner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Sumner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Sumner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Sumner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Sumner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Sumner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Sumner. The network helps show where Philip Sumner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Sumner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Sumner Line = papers co-authored together Philip Sumner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201981
2 197364
3 201735
4 202134
5 201832
6 201930
7 202026
8 201826
9 195523
10 202122
11 197322
12 202016
13 202016
14 202214
15 202013
16 202211
17 201811
18 202010
19 20229
20 20228

About Philip Sumner

Philip Sumner is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 42 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (19 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (256 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (180 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (103 citations) and Clinical Psychology (140 citations). Philip Sumner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Susan L. Rossell, Tamsyn E. Van Rheenen, Sean Carruthers, Caroline Gurvich, Erica Neill, Eric J. Tan, Imogen Bell, Andrea Phillipou, Wei Lin Toh and Denny Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Schizophrenia Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact