Philip Snaith

625 citations
14 papers · 367 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 2
    • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions 1
    • Gender Roles and Identity Studies 4

Philip Snaith

14 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Philip Snaith
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 114
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
  • Clinical Psychology 114
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 78
  • Social Psychology 76
Replace Praful Chandarana with:
Praful Chandarana Canada
R L Spitzer United States
David Ekström United States
Brett Y. Lu United States
Thomas Lichte Germany
Murat Rezaki Türkiye
Leo F. Droppleman United States
Maria Alessandra Scarpato Italy
Nina Timmerby Denmark
Dirk De Doncker Belgium
Philip Snaith relative to Praful Chandarana Canada Praful Chandarana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Praful Chandarana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Snaith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Snaith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Snaith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Snaith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Snaith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Snaith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Snaith. The network helps show where Philip Snaith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Philip Snaith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Snaith Line = papers co-authored together Philip Snaith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1993138
2 1993108
3 199534
4 199328
5 199218
6 198315
7
Measuring anxiety and depression.
199311
8 19984
9 20022
10 19942
11 19862
12 19942
13 19922
14 19931

About Philip Snaith

Philip Snaith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (114 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations), Clinical Psychology (114 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (78 citations) and Social Psychology (76 citations). Philip Snaith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Selby, Galina Velikova, Russell Reid, D. R. Bromham, Eileen Kennedy, Alan Butler and David Owens. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, Psychological Medicine and Psychiatric Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact