Philip Shearman
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Forest Management and Policy
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
Papers in
- Ecology 6
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 2
- Oil Palm Production and Sustainability 2
- Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics 2
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 5
- Forest Management and Policy 3
- Co-authors
- Jane Bryan (5 shared papers)Gregory P. Asner (1 shared paper)David Knapp (1 shared paper)William F. Laurance (1 shared paper)J. P. Walsh (1 shared paper)Gary Bull (1 shared paper)Horst Weyerhaeuser (1 shared paper)Brendan Mackey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Forest Science (2 papers)AMBIO (1 paper)Journal of Coastal Research (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Papua New GuineaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip Shearman
8 papers receiving 366 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Global and Planetary Change 180
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 85
- Ecology 167
- Forestry 26
- Ecological Modeling 25
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Shearman
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Shearman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Shearman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Shearman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Shearman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Shearman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Shearman. The network helps show where Philip Shearman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Philip Shearman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 192 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 80 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 8 | River sediment monitoring for baseline and change characterisation: A new management tool for the Ramu River Communities in Papua New Guinea | 2011 | 1 |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 |
About Philip Shearman
Philip Shearman is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Earth-Surface Processes, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Forest Management and Policy (3 papers), Geological formations and processes (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Oil Palm Production and Sustainability (2 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (2 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (1 paper) and Coastal and Marine Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (180 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (85 citations), Ecology (167 citations), Forestry (26 citations) and Ecological Modeling (25 citations). Philip Shearman has collaborated with scholars based in Papua New Guinea, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Bryan, Gregory P. Asner, David Knapp, William F. Laurance, J. P. Walsh, Gary Bull, Horst Weyerhaeuser, Brendan Mackey, Alexander V. Lebedev and Su Yufang. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Forest Science, AMBIO, Journal of Coastal Research, PLoS ONE and Ecology and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.