Frédéric Bioret

1.1k citations
80 papers · 521 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Bioret

69 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Frédéric Bioret
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Ecological Modeling 56
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 128
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 150
  • Ecology 166
  • Global and Planetary Change 123
Replace Peter A. Stroh with:
Peter A. Stroh United Kingdom
Ross Rowe Australia
Kátia Torres Ribeiro Brazil
Heidi C Zimmer Australia
Angela J. Brandt United States
Roger B. Good Australia
Harald Plachter Germany
Margaretha van Rooyen Canada
Sara Souther United States
Hélida Ferreira da Cunha Brazil
Frédéric Bioret relative to Peter A. Stroh United Kingdom Peter A. Stroh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter A. Stroh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Bioret

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Bioret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Bioret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Bioret more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Bioret

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Bioret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Bioret. The network helps show where Frédéric Bioret may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Bioret, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Bioret Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Bioret links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202247
2 201734
3 201233
4
Prodrome des végétations de France
200431
5 200628
6 202126
7 199526
8 200519
9 202317
10 200116
11 202015
12 201213
13 201112
14 202412
15 201112
16 201011
17 20199
18 20099
19 19919
20 19948

About Frédéric Bioret

Frédéric Bioret is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Forestry and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 80 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (31 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (23 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (16 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (11 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (7 papers) and Agriculture and Rural Development Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (56 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (128 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (150 citations), Ecology (166 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (123 citations). Frédéric Bioret has collaborated with scholars based in France, Spain and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Françoise Gourmelon, Christian Kerbiriou, Pauline Delbosc, Raphaël Mathevet, Iwan Le Berre, Sébastien Rapinel, Jan‐Bernard Bouzillé, Jacquelyn Bond, R. E. Daniels and Jean‐Louis Chapuis. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Vegetation Science, Restoration Ecology, Ecological Engineering, Natures Sciences Sociétés and Ibis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact