Philip Pearson

19 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Philip Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 89
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 99
  • Biochemistry 39
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 36
  • Epidemiology 139
Replace Lisa M Miles with:
Lisa M Miles United Kingdom
Beatriz Navarro Bravo Spain
Erin L. Richman United States
Carlos Redondo Spain
Viktória Prémusz Hungary
Joanna Kowalkowska Poland
Susan J. Hall United Kingdom
Guifa Xu China
Esther Ubago‐Guisado Spain
Haik Nikogosian Switzerland
Philip Pearson relative to Lisa M Miles United Kingdom Lisa M Miles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Lisa M Miles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Pearson. The network helps show where Philip Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Philip Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2011127
2 1990116
3 200695
4 199152
5 200945
6 199542
7 200541
8
MEI project about Measuring Eco-Innovation. Final report
200822
9 201219
10 200514
11 202010
12 20139
13 20188
14 20122
15 20062
16 20122
17
Looking for Culture: Implications of Two Forms of Social Theory for Art Educational Theory and Practice.
19951
18 19911
19 20061
20 19871

About Philip Pearson

Philip Pearson is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 20 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Children's Physical and Motor Development (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Physical Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers) and Youth Development and Social Support (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (89 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (99 citations), Biochemistry (39 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (36 citations) and Epidemiology (139 citations). Philip Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony D. Okely, Dean Dudley, Wayne Cotton, M.A. Bigrigg, B W Codling, M. D. Read, Sarah Lewis, Andrew Fogarty, John Britton and Ian Young. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of science and medicine in sport, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, European Physical Education Review, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity and Respiratory Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact