Philip Pearson

22 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

Philip Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 95
  • Epidemiology 186
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 7
  • Biochemistry 37
  • Physiology 101
Replace Rashmi Supriya with:
Rashmi Supriya Hong Kong
E. Pullenayegum Canada
Esther Ubago‐Guisado Spain
Bruno Miguel Borges de Sousa Magalhães Portugal
Stacey Emmonds United Kingdom
Vanessa M. Martinez Kercher United States
Serhat Özbay Türkiye
Gert Lukas Strydom South Africa
Katie Burford United States
Jungkwon Lee South Korea
Philip Pearson relative to Rashmi Supriya Hong Kong Rashmi Supriya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23×
Rashmi Supriya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Pearson. The network helps show where Philip Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Philip Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011130
2 1990113
3 200698
4 199152
5 200945
6 200543
7 199540
8 199125
9
MEI project about Measuring Eco-Innovation. Final report
200821
10 201220
11 200513
12 201812
13 202010
14 20139
15 19904
16 19983
17 20062
18 20122
19 20122
20 19871

About Philip Pearson

Philip Pearson is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Physiology, Biochemistry, Epidemiology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 24 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Education and Pedagogy (8 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers), Trace Elements in Health (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Gynecological conditions and treatments (1 paper) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (95 citations), Epidemiology (186 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (7 citations), Biochemistry (37 citations) and Physiology (101 citations). Philip Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony David Okely, Dean Alan Dudley, B W Codling, M.A. Bigrigg, Wayne Cotton, Andrew Fogarty, John R Britton, Sarah Lewis, Ian Stuart Young and Ron G. M. Kemp. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of science and medicine in sport, The Lancet, Respiratory Medicine, European Physical Education Review and European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact