Philip Levy

672 citations
27 papers · 474 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Levy

24 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Philip Levy
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 62
  • Statistics and Probability 36
  • Clinical Psychology 75
Replace Edward W. Minium with:
Edward W. Minium United States
Steve Blinkhorn United Kingdom
Harold R. Strang United States
Duncan N. Hansen United States
James J. Hennessy United States
Wayne S. Zimmerman United States
Janet M. Gibson United States
José Santacreu Spain
Alexander G. Wesman Germany
Gregor Sočan Slovenia
Philip Levy relative to Edward W. Minium United States Edward W. Minium's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Edward W. Minium · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Levy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Levy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Levy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Levy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Levy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Levy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Levy. The network helps show where Philip Levy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Philip Levy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Levy Line = papers co-authored together Philip Levy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967152
2 196880
3 199460
4 196741
5 199230
6 196920
7 198711
8
Cognition in action, 2nd ed.
199410
9 19749
10 19669
11 19957
12 19696
13 19696
14 19645
15 19695
16 19675
17 19624
18 19723
19 19662
20 19692

About Philip Levy

Philip Levy is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Anthropology, History and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 27 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (62 citations), Statistics and Probability (36 citations) and Clinical Psychology (75 citations). Philip Levy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Mary M. Smyth, Peter E. Morris, Alan F. Collins, Derek S. Pugh, David Elmakis and Ruth M. Beard. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems and Educational Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact