Philip Levy

667 citations
27 papers · 470 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Levy

24 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Philip Levy
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 68
  • Statistics and Probability 36
  • Clinical Psychology 78
Replace Alexander G. Wesman with:
Alexander G. Wesman Germany
Charles D. Smock United States
Lutz F. Hornke Germany
Edward W. Minium United States
Harold R. Strang United States
Bryce B. Hudgins United States
José Santacreu Spain
Gale H. Roid United States
Heinz Holling Germany
Peter J. Legree United States
Philip Levy relative to Alexander G. Wesman Germany Alexander G. Wesman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alexander G. Wesman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Levy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Levy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Levy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Levy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Levy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Levy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Levy. The network helps show where Philip Levy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Philip Levy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Levy Line = papers co-authored together Philip Levy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967148
2 196879
3 199454
4 196736
5 199227
6
Tests in Education: A Book of Critical Reviews
198419
7 196919
8 198711
9 19749
10
Cognition in action, 2nd ed.
19949
11 19669
12 19697
13 19956
14 19695
15 19675
16 19695
17 19645
18 19623
19 19693
20 19723

About Philip Levy

Philip Levy is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Anthropology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History, having authored 27 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (1 paper) and Library Science and Information Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (68 citations), Statistics and Probability (36 citations) and Clinical Psychology (78 citations). Philip Levy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Mary M. Smyth, Peter E. Morris, Alan F. Collins, Harvey Goldstein, David Elmakis and Ruth Beard. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact