Philip Leith

489 citations
60 papers · 280 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Leith

43 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Philip Leith
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Law 82
  • Political Science and International Relations 122
  • Artificial Intelligence 116
  • Communication 17
  • Safety Research 16
Replace Jon Bing with:
Jon Bing Norway
Jörn von Lucke Germany
Giovanni De Gregorio United Kingdom
Federico Casolari Italy
Julia Pohle Germany
Maja Brkan Netherlands
Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon United Kingdom
Nicola Lucchi Spain
Clare Sullivan United States
Thomas Margoni Belgium
Philip Leith relative to Jon Bing Norway Jon Bing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jon Bing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Leith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Leith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Leith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Leith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Leith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Leith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Leith. The network helps show where Philip Leith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Philip Leith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Leith Line = papers co-authored together Philip Leith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198631
2
THE RISE AND FALL OF THE LEGAL EXPERT SYSTEM
201026
3 199824
4
The Barrister's World: And the Nature of Law
199123
5 201617
6 200414
7 198313
8 198811
9 199111
10 199810
11 199810
12 20078
13 19917
14 20047
15 19875
16 19865
17 20094
18 20014
19 20004
20 20063

About Philip Leith

Philip Leith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Strategy and Management, having authored 60 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Law (20 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (17 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (8 papers), Law in Society and Culture (6 papers), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (5 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (82 citations), Political Science and International Relations (122 citations), Artificial Intelligence (116 citations), Communication (17 citations) and Safety Research (16 citations). Philip Leith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John Morison, C. E. Fellows, Subhajit Basu, Joe Duffy, David Newman and J. M. Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as International Review of Law Computers & Technology, The Computer Journal, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Software Practice and Experience and Artificial Intelligence Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact