Philip E. Leis
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
- African history and culture studies
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Emotions and Moral Behavior
Papers in
-
- Critical Race Theory in Education 2
- Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy 1
- African Studies and Ethnography 1
- Co-authors
- Marida Hollos (6 shared papers)Elliot Turiel (1 shared paper)Joseph Campbell (1 shared paper)George L. Hicks (1 shared paper)Alan Richardson (1 shared paper)Paul Stoller (1 shared paper)Robert Brain (1 shared paper)Richard M. Dorson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ethos (4 papers)American Anthropologist (2 papers)Western Folklore (2 papers)American Ethnologist (1 paper)African Studies Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip E. Leis
21 papers receiving 289 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Anthropology 80
- Social Psychology 96
- Sociology and Political Science 183
- Cognitive Neuroscience 62
- Music 10
Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Leis
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Leis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Leis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Leis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Leis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Leis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Leis. The network helps show where Philip E. Leis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. Leis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 97 | |
| 2 | 1961 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 37 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 32 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 24 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1973 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1964 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 13 | Enculturation and socialization in an Ijaw village | 1972 | 10 |
| 14 | 1965 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1970 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1968 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1970 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1964 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 3 |
About Philip E. Leis
Philip E. Leis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers), African history and culture analysis (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), African Studies and Ethnography (1 paper) and Rural development and sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (80 citations), Social Psychology (96 citations), Sociology and Political Science (183 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (62 citations) and Music (10 citations). Philip E. Leis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marida Hollos, Elliot Turiel, Joseph Campbell, George L. Hicks, Alan Richardson, Paul Stoller, Robert Brain and Richard M. Dorson. Their work appears in journals such as Ethos, American Anthropologist, Western Folklore, American Ethnologist and African Studies Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.