Philip E. Leis

664 citations
22 papers · 358 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Anthropological Studies and Insights
    • African history and culture studies
    • Cultural Differences and Values

Papers in

Philip E. Leis

20 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Philip E. Leis
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Anthropology 73
  • Social Psychology 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 157
  • Music 10
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 50
Replace John Kirkpatrick with:
John Kirkpatrick United States
Abraham D. Lavender United States
William P. Murphy United States
Robert S. Ellwood United States
Hugh B. Urban United States
Samuel Beckett United Kingdom
Marta Weigle United States
William C. McCormack Canada
carol duncan United States
Henry Rosemont United States
Philip E. Leis relative to John Kirkpatrick United States John Kirkpatrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John Kirkpatrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Leis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Leis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Leis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Leis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Leis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Leis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Leis. The network helps show where Philip E. Leis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. Leis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. Leis Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. Leis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198669
2 196148
3 198932
4 197831
5 200125
6 197022
7 199718
8 197016
9 197316
10 200114
11 196410
12
Enculturation and socialization in an Ijaw village
197210
13 196510
14 19869
15 19958
16 19707
17 19705
18 19853
19 19643
20
Accommodation in a Plural Chiefdom
19701

About Philip E. Leis

Philip E. Leis is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers), African history and culture analysis (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper) and Rural development and sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (73 citations), Social Psychology (78 citations), Sociology and Political Science (157 citations), Music (10 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (50 citations). Philip E. Leis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marida Hollos, Joseph Campbell, Elliot Turiel, George L. Hicks, Alan Richardson, Paul Stoller, Robert Brain and Richard M. Dorson. Their work appears in journals such as Ethos, Western Folklore, American Anthropologist, American Ethnologist and International Migration Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact