Philip Baum
Impact in
-
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Papers in
- Oncology 15
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments 6
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 6
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 4
-
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 7
- Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations 5
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes 4
- Co-authors
- Armin Wiegering (19 shared papers)Johannes Diers (17 shared papers)Christoph‐Thomas Germer (13 shared papers)Harald Matthes (4 shared papers)Johanna Wagner (5 shared papers)Carolin Kastner (3 shared papers)Niels Matthes (3 shared papers)Nicolas Schlegel (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Philip Baum
26 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Oncology 187
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
- Emergency Medicine 50
- Surgery 193
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 77
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Baum
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Baum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Baum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Baum. The network helps show where Philip Baum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Philip Baum
Philip Baum is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (187 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations), Emergency Medicine (50 citations), Surgery (193 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (77 citations). Philip Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Armin Wiegering, Johannes Diers, Christoph‐Thomas Germer, Harald Matthes, Johanna Wagner, Carolin Kastner, Niels Matthes, Nicolas Schlegel, Stefan Löb and Martin Eichhorn. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Surgery, BJS Open, European Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Surgical Oncology and Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.