Philip Baum
Impact in
-
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
-
- Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Diverticular Disease and Complications
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 5
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes 2
- Oncology 5
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 2
- COVID-19 and healthcare impacts 2
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Armin Wiegering (19 shared papers)Johannes Diers (17 shared papers)Christoph‐Thomas Germer (13 shared papers)Harald Matthes (4 shared papers)Johanna Wagner (5 shared papers)Carolin Kastner (3 shared papers)Niels Matthes (3 shared papers)Nicolas Schlegel (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Philip Baum
25 papers receiving 385 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Oncology 95
- Surgery 126
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 8
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 69
- Emergency Medicine 18
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Baum
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Baum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Baum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Baum. The network helps show where Philip Baum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Philip Baum
Philip Baum is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Economics and Econometrics and Molecular Biology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (95 citations), Surgery (126 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (8 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (69 citations) and Emergency Medicine (18 citations). Philip Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Armin Wiegering, Johannes Diers, Christoph‐Thomas Germer, Harald Matthes, Johanna Wagner, Carolin Kastner, Niels Matthes, Nicolas Schlegel, Stefan Löb and H. Winter. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Surgery, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, BJS Open, European Journal of Cancer and Cancer Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.