Phil Shearman
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Forest Management and Policy
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 6
- Forest Management and Policy 2
- Fire effects on ecosystems 2
- Ecology 2
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 2
- Co-authors
- Jane Bryan (4 shared papers)Julian Ash (3 shared papers)Brendan Mackey (1 shared paper)JB Kirkpatrick (2 shared papers)Leo Makita (1 shared paper)Sibauk Bieb (1 shared paper)Alexander Rosewell (2 shared papers)David Muscatello (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ecological Applications (1 paper)Austral Ecology (1 paper)Biotropica (1 paper)Journal of Environmental Management (1 paper)Bulletin of the World Health Organization (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaPapua New Guinea
In The Last Decade
Phil Shearman
8 papers receiving 254 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Global and Planetary Change 144
- Ecological Modeling 28
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 65
- Forestry 20
- Geography, Planning and Development 25
Countries citing papers authored by Phil Shearman
This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Shearman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Shearman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Shearman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Shearman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Shearman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Shearman. The network helps show where Phil Shearman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Phil Shearman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 133 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 6 | Large acquisition of rights on forest lands for tropical timber concessions and commercial wood plantations | 2011 | 11 |
| 7 | Mining and Critical Ecosystems | 2003 | 4 |
| 8 | 2021 | 2 |
About Phil Shearman
Phil Shearman is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation and General Health Professions, having authored 8 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (2 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (1 paper), Forest ecology and management (1 paper), Malaria Research and Control (1 paper) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (144 citations), Ecological Modeling (28 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (65 citations), Forestry (20 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (25 citations). Phil Shearman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Papua New Guinea. Frequent co-authors include Jane Bryan, Julian Ash, Brendan Mackey, JB Kirkpatrick, Leo Makita, Sibauk Bieb, Alexander Rosewell, David Muscatello, R. Akers and Keith Barney. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Applications, Austral Ecology, Biotropica, Journal of Environmental Management and Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.