Phil Reed

7.0k citations
314 papers · 5.3k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Phil Reed

296 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Phil Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 3.0k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
  • Applied Psychology 196
Replace Stephanie D. Preston with:
Stephanie D. Preston United States
Alan Poling United States
Ted Ruffman New Zealand
C. Fergus Lowe United Kingdom
Simon Dymond United Kingdom
Kelly G. Lambert United States
C. B. Ferster United States
Guy Woodruff United States
Virginia Slaughter Australia
Philippe Rochat United States
Phil Reed relative to Stephanie D. Preston United States Stephanie D. Preston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Stephanie D. Preston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Reed. The network helps show where Phil Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Reed Line = papers co-authored together Phil Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 314 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007422
2 2010235
3 1973229
4 2008159
5 2009145
6 2010104
7 2005102
8 2006100
9 201487
10 201386
11 201576
12 200773
13 200756
14 201155
15 201248
16 199647
17 201146
18 200946
19 200645
20 201243

About Phil Reed

Phil Reed is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 314 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (119 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (100 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (41 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (33 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (32 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (32 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (24 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (3.0k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations) and Applied Psychology (196 citations). Phil Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lisa A. Osborne, Louise McHugh, Jo Saunders, R. Truzoli, Paul Bakan, Michela Romano, Elias Tsakanikos, Todd R. Schachtman, Geoffrey Hall and Norah Frederickson. Their work appears in journals such as Learning and Motivation, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Learning & Behavior, Research in autism spectrum disorders and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact