Phaedra Diamond
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Papers in
-
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments 5
- Surgery 2
- Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes 2
- Hernia repair and management 1
- Co-authors
- J. G. Ray (1 shared paper)Chaim M. Bell (1 shared paper)Garvita Singh (1 shared paper)David W. Litchfield (1 shared paper)Gary J. Gorbsky (1 shared paper)Ronald B. Saulnier (1 shared paper)Annette Epp (2 shared papers)Queena Chou (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (3 papers)International Urogynecology Journal (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)Neurourology and Urodynamics (1 paper)BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Phaedra Diamond
7 papers receiving 381 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 146
- Rheumatology 132
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 72
- Surgery 60
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 27
Countries citing papers authored by Phaedra Diamond
This map shows the geographic impact of Phaedra Diamond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phaedra Diamond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phaedra Diamond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phaedra Diamond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phaedra Diamond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phaedra Diamond. The network helps show where Phaedra Diamond may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Phaedra Diamond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 137 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | A Randomized Controlled Trial of The Uresta Continence Device: Short term UResta Efficacy Study (“SURE” Study) | 2014 | 2 |
| 7 | 2015 | 1 |
About Phaedra Diamond
Phaedra Diamond is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Urology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (5 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1 paper), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (1 paper), Hernia repair and management (1 paper), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (1 paper), Signaling Pathways in Disease (1 paper) and Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (146 citations), Rheumatology (132 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (72 citations), Surgery (60 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (27 citations). Phaedra Diamond has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include J. G. Ray, Chaim M. Bell, Garvita Singh, David W. Litchfield, Gary J. Gorbsky, Ronald B. Saulnier, Annette Epp, Queena Chou, David A. Wilkie and Jane Schulz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, International Urogynecology Journal, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Neurourology and Urodynamics and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.