Ph. Ebert

3.6k citations
149 papers · 3.1k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Ph. Ebert

147 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Ph. Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Structural Biology 134
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.8k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 557
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 176
  • Materials Chemistry 1.4k
Replace D. Naumović with:
D. Naumović Switzerland
Tatau Nishinaga Japan
Bhupendra Nath Dev India
D. J. H. Cockayne Australia
Ben G. Yacobi United States
J. Derrien France
W. L. O’Brien United States
John F. Wendelken United States
J. Hornstra Netherlands
TAKEO ICHINOKAWA Japan
Ph. Ebert relative to D. Naumović Switzerland D. Naumović's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
D. Naumović · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ph. Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ph. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ph. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ph. Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ph. Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ph. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ph. Ebert. The network helps show where Ph. Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ph. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ph. Ebert Line = papers co-authored together Ph. Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 149 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999156
2 1996141
3 2002125
4 1996113
5 199473
6 199670
7 199866
8 199763
9 199659
10 199357
11 200857
12 199656
13 199855
14 199555
15 200552
16 201351
17 200445
18 200143
19 199943
20 201941

About Ph. Ebert

Ph. Ebert is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Structural Biology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 149 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (55 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (50 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (35 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (34 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (28 papers), Quasicrystal Structures and Properties (19 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (13 papers) and Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (134 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.8k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (557 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (176 citations) and Materials Chemistry (1.4k citations). Ph. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Knut W. Urban, C. Domke, M. Heinrich, M. G. Lagally, Holger Eisele, Rafal E. Dunin‐Borkowski, Matthias Simon, Chih‐Kang Shih, Karsten Urban and Л. Д. Иванова. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Surface Science and Physical review. B..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact