Peter Wyer

78 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peter Wyer's Hit Papers

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature 2000 · 772 citations
7720+8+17Years since publication250500750

Peers

Peter Wyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Family Practice 119
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 303
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 47
  • Emergency Medicine 342
  • General Health Professions 714
Replace G Mowatt with:
G Mowatt United Kingdom
Robert Mcnutt United States
Alain Mayhew Canada
Suzanne Hill Australia
Duncan Hunter Canada
Jeanette Ward Australia
Daniel Hind United Kingdom
Randall D. Cebul United States
Gabriel Rada Chile
Sara Schroter United Kingdom
Peter Wyer relative to G Mowatt United Kingdom G Mowatt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
G Mowatt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Wyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Wyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Wyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Wyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Wyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Wyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Wyer. The network helps show where Peter Wyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Wyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Wyer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Wyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Hit paper breakdown →
2000772
2 2014292
3 2006220
4 2000166
5 2008108
6 200378
7 200054
8 200851
9 200839
10 200338
11 200435
12 200534
13 199833
14 200032
15 201032
16 200932
17 199931
18 199730
19 201530
20 200929

About Peter Wyer

Peter Wyer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Family Practice and Emergency Medicine, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (30 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (18 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (10 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (119 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (303 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (47 citations), Emergency Medicine (342 citations) and General Health Professions (714 citations). Peter Wyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas McGinn, C. David Naylor, Ian G. Stiell, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, Gordon Guyatt, Eddy Lang, R. Brian Haynes, Rita Charon, C.B. Irvin and Lowell W. Gerson. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Academic Emergency Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact