Peter Wild

1.5k citations
64 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Wild

61 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Wild
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Signal Processing 966
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 616
  • Safety Research 193
  • Information Systems 444
  • Transportation 58
Replace Rohayanti Hassan with:
Rohayanti Hassan Malaysia
Anush Sankaran India
Akanksha Joshi India
Fouad Khelifi United Kingdom
Ishan Nigam India
Dhairya Vyas India
Aditya Ramesh United States
Jiyi Li Japan
Diaa Uliyan Jordan
Hongbing Li China
Peter Wild relative to Rohayanti Hassan Malaysia Rohayanti Hassan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.5×
Rohayanti Hassan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Wild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Wild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Wild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Wild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Wild. The network helps show where Peter Wild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Wild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Wild Line = papers co-authored together Peter Wild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012111
2 201479
3 201668
4 200064
5 201356
6
Iris Recognition: From Segmentation to Template Security
201253
7 201552
8 201243
9 201642
10 201240
11 201139
12 201734
13 201032
14 201630
15 200923
16 201523
17 200922
18 201121
19 201119
20 201519

About Peter Wild

Peter Wild is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Safety Research and Genetics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biometric Identification and Security (49 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (22 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (12 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (9 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (8 papers), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (6 papers), Face recognition and analysis (5 papers) and Digital Media Forensic Detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (966 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (616 citations), Safety Research (193 citations), Information Systems (444 citations) and Transportation (58 citations). Peter Wild has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Uhl, Christian Rathgeb, Heinz Hofbauer, James Ferryman, John A. Dearing, Josef Bigün, Fernando Alonso‐Fernandez, Lulu Chen, Bojan Čukić and Emanuela Marasco. Their work appears in journals such as Western American literature, Lecture notes in computer science, Rhetoric Review, Pattern Recognition and Advances in computer vision and pattern recognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact