Fred Piper

47 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers

Fred Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 193
  • Geometry and Topology 89
  • Artificial Intelligence 294
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 136
  • Algebra and Number Theory 38
Replace R. G. Stanton with:
R. G. Stanton Canada
George Havas Australia
R. C. Mullin Canada
Susan Williamson United States
Daniel Panario Canada
Clement Lam Canada
Andrew Klapper United States
R.P. Anstee Canada
Anne Street Australia
Pantelimon Stănică United States
Fred Piper relative to R. G. Stanton Canada R. G. Stanton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
R. G. Stanton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Piper. The network helps show where Fred Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Fred Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Piper Line = papers co-authored together Fred Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972131
2 1988101
3
Secure speech communications
198552
4 197450
5
Encryption algorithms
199238
6
Cryptography: A Very Short Introduction
200234
7 196727
8
Why Quantum Cryptography
200423
9 200220
10 196820
11 198914
12 198913
13 197613
14 196712
15 196312
16 196612
17 196610
18 19879
19 19778
20
The management of security
19948

About Fred Piper

Fred Piper is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include graph theory and CDMA systems (13 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (9 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (8 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (6 papers), Mathematics and Applications (5 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (4 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (3 papers) and Cryptography and Data Security (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (193 citations), Geometry and Topology (89 citations), Artificial Intelligence (294 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (136 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (38 citations). Fred Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Chris J. Mitchell, Henry J. Beker, Michael J. Ganley, Seán Murphy, Peter F. Dembowski, Sean D. Murphy, Kenneth G. Paterson, Rüdiger Schack, Daniel Hughes and Peter Wild. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Computer Communications and Discrete Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact