Fred Piper

1.3k citations
73 papers · 939 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Piper

63 papers receiving 838 citations

Peers

Fred Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 220
  • Artificial Intelligence 433
  • Geometry and Topology 101
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 181
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 205
Replace R. C. Mullin with:
R. C. Mullin Canada
Anne Street Australia
Adolfo Piperno Italy
J. Spencer United States
Albrecht Beutelspacher Germany
George Havas Australia
Daniel M. Gordon United States
Robert R. Singleton United States
R. G. Stanton Canada
R.P. Anstee Canada
Fred Piper relative to R. C. Mullin Canada R. C. Mullin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R. C. Mullin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Piper. The network helps show where Fred Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Piper Line = papers co-authored together Fred Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972158
2 1988134
3 197465
4
Secure speech communications
198560
5
Encryption algorithms
199253
6
Cryptography: A Very Short Introduction
200243
7 200738
8 196730
9
Why Quantum Cryptography
200428
10 200223
11 196821
12 198919
13 197618
14 199015
15 198913
16 196613
17 196712
18 196312
19 198712
20 197711

About Fred Piper

Fred Piper is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 73 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include graph theory and CDMA systems (15 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (12 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (11 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (6 papers), Mathematics and Applications (6 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (6 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (5 papers) and Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (220 citations), Artificial Intelligence (433 citations), Geometry and Topology (101 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (181 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (205 citations). Fred Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Chris J. Mitchell, Henry J. Beker, Michael J. Ganley, Seán Murphy, T. Beth, Peter F. Dembowski, Sean D. Murphy, Kenneth G. Paterson, Rüdiger Schack and Daniel Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Discrete Mathematics and Geometriae Dedicata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact