Peter Weiler

755 citations
33 papers · 371 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Weiler

25 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Peter Weiler
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • History 102
  • History and Philosophy of Science 43
  • General Psychology 11
  • Political Science and International Relations 167
  • Public Administration 19
Replace John H. Kautsky with:
John H. Kautsky United States
George Lichtheim
J. F. C. Harrison United Kingdom
Jean H. Quataert United States
Harvey E. Klehr United States
Stanley Coben United States
Iorwerth Prothero United Kingdom
Sandrine Kott Switzerland
David H. Pinkney United States
Malcolm Jack United Kingdom
Peter Weiler relative to John H. Kautsky United States John H. Kautsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
John H. Kautsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Weiler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Weiler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Weiler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Weiler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Weiler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Weiler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Weiler. The network helps show where Peter Weiler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter Weiler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Weiler Line = papers co-authored together Peter Weiler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980169
2 199533
3 199022
4 198118
5 199218
6 198212
7 198412
8 20089
9 20008
10 19918
11 19878
12 20137
13 20036
14 19996
15 19765
16 19925
17 20064
18 19824
19 19873
20 19913

About Peter Weiler

Peter Weiler is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Sociology and Political Science, History and Geometry and Topology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (9 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (5 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers) and Polynomial and algebraic computation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (102 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (43 citations), General Psychology (11 citations), Political Science and International Relations (167 citations) and Public Administration (19 citations). Peter Weiler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Collini, John Harvey Kent, Kenneth O. Morgan, Michael E. Pohst, Hans J. Zassenhaus, James E. Cronin, Anne Deighton, Mary Anne Anderson, Roy A. Church and Eric Ashby. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Twentieth Century British History, Mathematics of Computation, Contemporary British History and Diplomatic History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact