Éimear Smith

35 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

Éimear Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 203
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 144
  • Rehabilitation 42
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
  • Neurology 79
Replace Mark Delargy with:
Mark Delargy Ireland
M H Fraser United Kingdom
Gabriel Zeilig Israel
Mary Schmidt Read United States
Sara Carroll Australia
Jocelyn L. Bowden Australia
Charlotte Yates United States
PA Joseph France
James S. Walter United States
Christian Schuld Germany
Éimear Smith relative to Mark Delargy Ireland Mark Delargy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark Delargy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Éimear Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Éimear Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Éimear Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Éimear Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Éimear Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Éimear Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Éimear Smith. The network helps show where Éimear Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Éimear Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Éimear Smith Line = papers co-authored together Éimear Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005266
2 201241
3 200938
4 201537
5 201332
6 201931
7 201531
8
Sequence of action of the diaphragm and intercostal muscles during respiration. I. Inspiration.
195827
9 201624
10 201323
11 200719
12 202019
13 201817
14 201017
15 202015
16 201113
17 201713
18 197411
19 20198
20 20147

About Éimear Smith

Éimear Smith is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (18 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (3 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (203 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (144 citations), Rehabilitation (42 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations) and Neurology (79 citations). Éimear Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark Delargy, Catherine Comiskey, Áine Carroll, Peter W. New, Andrea Townson, Marcel W. M. Post, Inge Eriks‐Hoogland, Giorgio Scivoletto, Anupam Gupta and Ronald K. Reeves. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Disability and Rehabilitation and Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact