Peter W. Moonlight

27 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers

Peter W. Moonlight
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Ecological Modeling 34
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 108
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 44
  • Paleontology 9
  • Global and Planetary Change 26
Replace Caroline Oliveira Andrino with:
Caroline Oliveira Andrino Brazil
Álvaro Idárraga Colombia
Caetano Troncoso Oliveira Brazil
Pierre‐André Loizeau Switzerland
Parastoo Mahdavi Iran
Lívia Echternacht Brazil
Denise Sasaki Brazil
Kevin Karbstein Germany
Andrea Kießling Chile
Erika Bazzato Italy
Peter W. Moonlight relative to Caroline Oliveira Andrino Brazil Caroline Oliveira Andrino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Caroline Oliveira Andrino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. Moonlight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. Moonlight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. Moonlight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. Moonlight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. Moonlight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. Moonlight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. Moonlight. The network helps show where Peter W. Moonlight may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter W. Moonlight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter W. Moonlight Line = papers co-authored together Peter W. Moonlight links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201535
2 202016
3 202416
4 202215
5 202111
6 202310
7 202210
8 20248
9 20197
10 20246
11 20234
12 20174
13 20223
14 20233
15 20163
16 20172
17 20232
18 20232
19 20182
20 20182

About Peter W. Moonlight

Peter W. Moonlight is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling, having authored 33 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (21 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (20 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (2 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (34 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (108 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 citations), Paleontology (9 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (26 citations). Peter W. Moonlight has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Mark C. Tebbitt, Domingos Cardoso, Tiina Särkinen, R. Toby Pennington, Mark Hughes, Rafael S. Oliveira, James Richardson, Lucy Rowland, Ching‐I Peng and Daniel C. Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Phytotaxa, Annals of Botany, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Edinburgh Journal of Botany and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact