Ching‐I Peng
Impact in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant and animal studies
- Plant Science top 2%
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 120
- Plant and animal studies 30
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 11
-
- Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions 122
- Co-authors
- Tzen‐Yuh Chiang (11 shared papers)Kuo‐Fang Chung (38 shared papers)Yoshiko Kono (45 shared papers)Barbara A. Schaal (3 shared papers)Rosario Rivera Rubite (16 shared papers)Yan Liu (17 shared papers)Wai Yie Leong (8 shared papers)Rimi Repin (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Ching‐I Peng
164 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.5k
- Plant Science 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Genetics 334
- Ecological Modeling 35
Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐I Peng
This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐I Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐I Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐I Peng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐I Peng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐I Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐I Peng. The network helps show where Ching‐I Peng may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐I Peng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 218 | |
| 2 | Universal primers for amplification and sequencing a noncoding spacer between the atpB and rbcL genes of chloroplast DNA | 1998 | 178 |
| 3 | 2007 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 6 | Synopsis of the Chinese species of Begonia (Begoniaceae), with a reappraisal of sectional delimitation | 2002 | 39 |
| 7 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 20 |
About Ching‐I Peng
Ching‐I Peng is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Genetics and Cell Biology, having authored 167 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (122 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (120 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (55 papers), Plant and animal studies (30 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (15 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (11 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (11 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.5k citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations), Genetics (334 citations) and Ecological Modeling (35 citations). Ching‐I Peng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Japan and China. Frequent co-authors include Tzen‐Yuh Chiang, Kuo‐Fang Chung, Yoshiko Kono, Barbara A. Schaal, Rosario Rivera Rubite, Yan Liu, Wai Yie Leong, Rimi Repin, Ruth Kiew and Yan Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Botanical studies, Phytotaxa, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, American Journal of Botany and Journal of Plant Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.