Peter Vickers

33 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Peter Vickers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • History and Philosophy of Science 263
  • Philosophy 100
  • Global and Planetary Change 106
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 64
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
Replace Alexander Reutlinger with:
Alexander Reutlinger Germany
Alexander Rueger Canada
Andreas Hüttemann Germany
Peter J. Lewis United States
Michela Massimi United Kingdom
Robert C. Bishop United States
Bradley Monton United States
Juha Saatsi United Kingdom
Sorin Bangu Norway
Yemima Ben‐Menahem Israel
Peter Vickers relative to Alexander Reutlinger Germany Alexander Reutlinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alexander Reutlinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Vickers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Vickers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Vickers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Vickers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Vickers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Vickers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Vickers. The network helps show where Peter Vickers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter Vickers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Vickers Line = papers co-authored together Peter Vickers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201368
2 201359
3 201652
4 201349
5 201032
6 201631
7 202225
8 200818
9 201616
10 202314
11 201113
12 201312
13 201012
14 20209
15 20237
16
Information UK 2000
19916
17 20096
18 20206
19
Are There No Such Things as Theories
20115
20 20095

About Peter Vickers

Peter Vickers is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Global and Planetary Change, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Philosophy and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (22 papers), Science and Climate Studies (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (6 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (4 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (2 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (263 citations), Philosophy (100 citations), Global and Planetary Change (106 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (64 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (43 citations). Peter Vickers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Henry Taylor, Juha Saatsi, Steven French, Sean McMahon, John R. C. Martyn, Timothy D. Lyons, Otávio Bueno, Mary Feeney, James D. Fraser and Steven J. Dick. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Astrobiology, International Journal of Astrobiology and European Journal for Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact