Peter Vickers

1.1k citations
33 papers · 475 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Vickers

33 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Peter Vickers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • History and Philosophy of Science 276
  • Philosophy 79
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 58
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 28
Replace Jan Faye with:
Jan Faye Denmark
Alexander Rueger Canada
Samuel C. Fletcher United States
Mara Beller Israel
Friedel Weinert United Kingdom
Brian Gee United Kingdom
Meinard Kuhlmann Germany
James F. Woodward United States
Henry J. Folse United States
Erhard Scheibe Germany
Peter Vickers relative to Jan Faye Denmark Jan Faye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Jan Faye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Vickers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Vickers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Vickers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Vickers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Vickers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Vickers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Vickers. The network helps show where Peter Vickers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Peter Vickers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Vickers Line = papers co-authored together Peter Vickers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201372
2 201357
3 201653
4 201350
5 201030
6 201630
7 202226
8 200817
9 202317
10 201616
11 201013
12 201113
13 201312
14 20209
15 20238
16 20096
17 20206
18 20095
19
Are There No Such Things as Theories
20115
20 20175

About Peter Vickers

Peter Vickers is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Philosophy, Information Systems and Management and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (22 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (15 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers), Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics (2 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper) and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (276 citations), Philosophy (79 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (58 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (28 citations). Peter Vickers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Henry Taylor, Juha T. Saatsi, Sean McMahon, Steven French, Otávio Bueno, James D. Fraser, Timothy D. Lyons, Christopher Cowie, Steven J. Dick and Lynn J. Rothschild. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Synthese, Astrobiology, Nature Astronomy and International Journal of Astrobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact