Peter T. Chivers

3.2k citations
51 papers · 2.8k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Peter T. Chivers

50 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Peter T. Chivers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 906
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 264
  • Inorganic Chemistry 235
  • Electrochemistry 104
Replace Julian C. Rutherford with:
Julian C. Rutherford United Kingdom
F. Wayne Outten United States
Mario Rivera United States
Jin‐Won Lee South Korea
Megan M. McEvoy United States
Megan J. Maher Australia
Richard A. Festa United States
Marianne Ilbert France
David H. Boxer United Kingdom
Raffaele Petruzzelli Italy
Peter T. Chivers relative to Julian C. Rutherford United Kingdom Julian C. Rutherford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Julian C. Rutherford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter T. Chivers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter T. Chivers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter T. Chivers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter T. Chivers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter T. Chivers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter T. Chivers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter T. Chivers. The network helps show where Peter T. Chivers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter T. Chivers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter T. Chivers Line = papers co-authored together Peter T. Chivers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997232
2 1996157
3 2003152
4 2000145
5 1997144
6 2019120
7 2006116
8 1999109
9 2008108
10 2017107
11 2002101
12 199788
13 200578
14 200573
15 202173
16 200770
17 200365
18 201263
19 200860
20 201056

About Peter T. Chivers

Peter T. Chivers is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cell Biology and Hematology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trace Elements in Health (23 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (12 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (10 papers), Redox biology and oxidative stress (7 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (7 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (6 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (5 papers) and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (906 citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (264 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (235 citations) and Electrochemistry (104 citations). Peter T. Chivers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert T. Sauer, Ronald T. Raines, Jeffrey S. Iwig, Kenneth E. Prehoda, Michael J. Maroney, T.H. Tahirov, Sharon V. Leitch, Robert W. Herbst, Michael John Bradley and Nigel J. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Bacteriology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Molecular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact