Peter Steiner

697 citations
43 papers · 364 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Steiner

29 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers

Peter Steiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Literature and Literary Theory 123
  • Language and Linguistics 85
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
  • Linguistics and Language 30
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 25
Replace Michaël Riffaterre with:
Michaël Riffaterre United States
Stephen Rudy United States
Ladislav Matějka United States
Boris Uspensky
Jean-Marie Schaeffer France
Michael Hancher India
Alan Durant United Kingdom
I. A. Richards United States
T. V. F. Brogan United States
Milman Parry
Peter Steiner relative to Michaël Riffaterre United States Michaël Riffaterre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Michaël Riffaterre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Steiner. The network helps show where Peter Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter Steiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Steiner Line = papers co-authored together Peter Steiner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198556
2 198651
3 198437
4 197829
5 197828
6 197826
7
On Poetic Language
197622
8 199520
9 198015
10 197910
11 20089
12 19809
13 19807
14 20016
15 20005
16
From formalism to structuralism : a comparative study of Russian formalism and Prague structuralism
19764
17 20164
18 19813
19
Structure, Sign and Function
19812
20 20002

About Peter Steiner

Peter Steiner is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Communication and Language and Linguistics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (5 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (4 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (4 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Literature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis (2 papers) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (123 citations), Language and Linguistics (85 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations), Linguistics and Language (30 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (25 citations). Peter Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include F. W. Galan, Jan Mukařovský, Milton Ehre, Ewa M. Thompson, Rimvydas Šilbajoris, Richard W. Bailey, Ladislav Matějka, Monroe C. Beardsley, Elizabeth W. Bruss and D. H. Whalen. Their work appears in journals such as Poetics Today, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Russian Literature, Comparative Literature and The Slavic and East European Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact