Peter Spijker

2.3k citations
40 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Spijker

39 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Peter Spijker
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Structural Biology 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 806
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 157
  • Electrochemistry 102
  • Materials Chemistry 664
Replace Lukáš Vlček with:
Lukáš Vlček United States
Keisuke Miyazawa Japan
Jeremy C. Palmer United States
Ning Liu China
Joost de Graaf Netherlands
Olivier Pluchery France
M. Neek-Amal Iran
Bruno Gompf Germany
T. Halicioǧlu United States
Peter Spijker relative to Lukáš Vlček United States Lukáš Vlček's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Lukáš Vlček · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Spijker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Spijker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Spijker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Spijker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Spijker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Spijker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Spijker. The network helps show where Peter Spijker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Spijker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Spijker Line = papers co-authored together Peter Spijker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015391
2 2013156
3 2014155
4 2015102
5 201785
6 201072
7 201772
8 200570
9 201768
10 201768
11 201667
12 201652
13 201150
14 201647
15 201247
16 200940
17 200639
18 201236
19 201133
20 201432

About Peter Spijker

Peter Spijker is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Applied Mathematics, Materials Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (9 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (8 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (6 papers), Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (5 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (5 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (4 papers) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (42 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (806 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (157 citations), Electrochemistry (102 citations) and Materials Chemistry (664 citations). Peter Spijker has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Adam S. Foster, Kislon Voı̈tchovsky, Jean‐François Molinari, Maria Ricci, Ernst Meyer, Shigeki Kawai, Shohei Saito, Shigehiro Yamaguchi, P.A.J. Hilbers and Albert J. Markvoort. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Langmuir and Tribology Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact