Bruno Gompf

3.6k citations
81 papers · 3.0k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Bruno Gompf

80 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Bruno Gompf
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.5k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 562
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 895
  • Materials Chemistry 1.2k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.3k
Replace Hiroshi Fukumura with:
Hiroshi Fukumura Japan
Harry E. Ruda Canada
C. N. Afonso Spain
F. Rieutord France
M. Canepa Italy
G. E. Jellison United States
Daniel Rosenmann United States
L. Tapfer Italy
M. K. Sanyal India
A. Meldrum Canada
Bruno Gompf relative to Hiroshi Fukumura Japan Hiroshi Fukumura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Hiroshi Fukumura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bruno Gompf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bruno Gompf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruno Gompf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruno Gompf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bruno Gompf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruno Gompf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruno Gompf. The network helps show where Bruno Gompf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bruno Gompf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bruno Gompf Line = papers co-authored together Bruno Gompf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000235
2 2000215
3 1997203
4 2010155
5 1994153
6 1992137
7 2009127
8 1994119
9 2008107
10 2006104
11 2014103
12 2005100
13 199663
14 199860
15 201154
16 199942
17 199542
18 199841
19 200639
20 199639

About Bruno Gompf

Bruno Gompf is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 81 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (15 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (14 papers), Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (11 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (9 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (8 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (7 papers) and Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (1.5k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (562 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (895 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.3k citations). Bruno Gompf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin Dressel, Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Ryan Pecha, J. Petersen, C. Ludwig, R. Strohmaier, Jens Pflaum, Detlef Lohse, Ruediger Toegel and D. Faltermeier. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Surface Science and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact