Peter Smith

228 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

Peter Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Statistics and Probability 383
  • Immunology and Allergy 248
  • Oncology 959
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 606
  • Demography 341
Replace Peter J. Neumann with:
Peter J. Neumann United States
Jason P. Fine United States
Nandita Mitra United States
Georg Heinze Austria
Iain Buchan United Kingdom
Chris Roberts Australia
Paul C. Lambert United Kingdom
Harold C. Sox United States
William Rosenberg United Kingdom
Vernon T. Farewell United Kingdom
Peter Smith relative to Peter J. Neumann United States Peter J. Neumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Peter J. Neumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Smith. The network helps show where Peter Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Smith Line = papers co-authored together Peter Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 236 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003370
2 1999224
3 1999211
4 2008202
5 2009180
6 2014159
7 2008152
8 2010145
9 2011137
10 2018131
11 2017127
12 2004124
13 2004120
14 199191
15 201388
16 199286
17 201683
18 200781
19 197581
20 201780

About Peter Smith

Peter Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Oncology, Statistics and Probability, General Health Professions and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 236 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (21 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (18 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (15 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (14 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (14 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (13 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (383 citations), Immunology and Allergy (248 citations), Oncology (959 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (606 citations) and Demography (341 citations). Peter Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan J. Forster, John W. McDonald, Patrick Sturgis, Paul Little, Claire Foster, Sheila Payne, James Raymer, Jakub Bijak, Jessica Corner and Antonio J. Ramírez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society), British Journal of Cancer, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics), Annals of Oncology and Journal of Biosocial Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact