Peter Schwerk

476 citations
11 papers · 368 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Vibrio bacteria research studies
    • Probiotics and Fermented Foods
    • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

Papers in

Peter Schwerk

11 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Peter Schwerk
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Endocrinology 57
  • Food Science 196
  • Animal Science and Zoology 74
  • Small Animals 35
  • Infectious Diseases 82
Replace Bregje Leyman with:
Bregje Leyman Belgium
Bernard Bradshaw Ireland
A. Woo-Ming United States
Adriana Maria de Almeida Brazil
Anuraj T. Sukumaran United States
J.A. Wagenaar Netherlands
Rajkumari Sanjukta India
Michael Bülte Germany
Eliane Pereira Mendonça Brazil
Pejvak Khaki Iran
Peter Schwerk relative to Bregje Leyman Belgium Bregje Leyman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Bregje Leyman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schwerk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schwerk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schwerk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schwerk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schwerk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schwerk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schwerk. The network helps show where Peter Schwerk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schwerk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schwerk Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schwerk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005174
2 200659
3 200129
4 201627
5 202222
6 201717
7 202114
8 20027
9 20237
10 20226
11 20186

About Peter Schwerk

Peter Schwerk is a scholar working on Food Science, Infectious Diseases, Genetics, Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (5 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (4 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (1 paper) and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (57 citations), Food Science (196 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (74 citations), Small Animals (35 citations) and Infectious Diseases (82 citations). Peter Schwerk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Karsten Tedin, Lothar H. Wieler, Arthur R. Thompson, Michael F.G. Schmidt, K.D. Weyrauch, Peter Schierack, David Taras, Lydia Scharek, Matthew D. Rolfe and Jay C. D. Hinton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Gut Microbes, Gut Pathogens, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Epidemiology and Infection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact