This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gut Pathogens. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gut Pathogens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gut Pathogens more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Gut Pathogens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gut Pathogens.
About Gut Pathogens
The 903 papers published in Gut Pathogens in the last decades have received a total of 23.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Gut Pathogens usually cover Endocrinology (123 papers), Molecular Medicine (69 papers), Food Science (183 papers), Infectious Diseases (116 papers) and Parasitology (30 papers) specifically the topics of Gut microbiota and health (233 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (132 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (97 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (81 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (69 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (52 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (51 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gut Pathogens are Alan C Logan, Paulina Markowiak‐Kopeć, Katarzyna Śliżewska, Alison C. Bested, Antonio Gasbarrini, Loris Riccardo Lopetuso, Franco Scaldaferri, Valentina Petito, Ramy Karam Aziz and G. Douglas Inglis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.