This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gut Pathogens. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gut Pathogens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gut Pathogens more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Gut Pathogens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gut Pathogens.
About Gut Pathogens
The 856 papers published in Gut Pathogens in the last decades have received a total of 21.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Gut Pathogens usually cover Endocrinology (117 papers), Infectious Diseases (192 papers), Molecular Medicine (54 papers), Food Science (162 papers) and Parasitology (29 papers) specifically the topics of Gut microbiota and health (161 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (120 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (86 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (85 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (83 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (67 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (54 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gut Pathogens are Alan Logan, Paulina Markowiak‐Kopeć, Katarzyna Śliżewska, Antonio Gasbarrini, Loris Riccardo Lopetuso, Valentina Petito, Franco Scaldaferri, Alison C. Bested, Ramy K. Aziz and G. Douglas Inglis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.