Peter Schmutz
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Usability and User Interface Design
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Papers in
-
- Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes 3
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour 2
- Co-authors
- Klaus Opwis (6 shared papers)Alfred Walz (1 shared paper)Javier A. Bargas-Avila (3 shared papers)Silvia Schnyder‐Candrian (1 shared paper)Christoph Mueller (1 shared paper)Sandra Roth (2 shared papers)Alexandre N. Tuch (2 shared papers)Mirjam Seckler (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Interacting with Computers (2 papers)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (1 paper)Journal of Leukocyte Biology (1 paper)Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Switzerland
In The Last Decade
Peter Schmutz
7 papers receiving 377 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Human-Computer Interaction 109
- Information Systems and Management 69
- Marketing 37
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
- Social Psychology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schmutz
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schmutz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schmutz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schmutz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schmutz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schmutz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schmutz. The network helps show where Peter Schmutz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schmutz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 132 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 7 | Cinematographic techniques in architectural animations and their effects on viewers' judgment | 2008 | 5 |
About Peter Schmutz
Peter Schmutz is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction and Surgery, having authored 7 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers), Inflammation biomarkers and pathways (1 paper), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper), Digital Communication and Language (1 paper) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (109 citations), Information Systems and Management (69 citations), Marketing (37 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations) and Social Psychology (56 citations). Peter Schmutz has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Opwis, Alfred Walz, Javier A. Bargas-Avila, Silvia Schnyder‐Candrian, Christoph Mueller, Sandra Roth, Alexandre N. Tuch and Mirjam Seckler. Their work appears in journals such as Interacting with Computers, Computers in Human Behavior, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Journal of Leukocyte Biology and Advances in Human-Computer Interaction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.