Peter Schellenberg

37 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers

Peter Schellenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Biophysics 128
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 85
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 110
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 160
  • Organic Chemistry 117
Replace Wulf Hofbauer with:
Wulf Hofbauer Germany
Kunihiko Ishii Japan
Xiao Yuan Li China
Kevin N. Walda United States
Frans C. De Schryver Belgium
E. W. Findsen United States
P. STEIN Israel
C. Galli United States
Aden A. Rehms United States
Jamie Conyard United Kingdom
Peter Schellenberg relative to Wulf Hofbauer Germany Wulf Hofbauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Wulf Hofbauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schellenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schellenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schellenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schellenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schellenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schellenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schellenberg. The network helps show where Peter Schellenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schellenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schellenberg Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schellenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201175
2 200171
3 201248
4 200137
5 199328
6 200628
7 200425
8 199824
9 200222
10 199417
11 200315
12 201414
13 199313
14 201413
15 196213
16 196212
17 195712
18 199412
19 199311
20 199111

About Peter Schellenberg

Peter Schellenberg is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (9 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers), Graphene research and applications (4 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (3 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (128 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (85 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (110 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (160 citations) and Organic Chemistry (117 citations). Peter Schellenberg has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Friedrich, Michael Belsley, Walther Parson, Anthony P. Espósito, M. Manuela M. Raposo, A. Fonseca, Philip J. Reid, M. Cidália R. Castro, J. Kikas and Paulius Grigaravičius. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Tetrahedron, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Journal of Luminescence and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact