Peter Rohner

158 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Peter Rohner
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 333
  • Microbiology 103
  • Clinical Biochemistry 629
  • Molecular Medicine 390
  • Infectious Diseases 1.4k
Replace Hung-Jen Tang with:
Hung-Jen Tang Taiwan
Philip M. Polgreen United States
ANTHONY W.C. CHOW Canada
Stephen A. Moser United States
Vitali Sintchenko Australia
Young Uh South Korea
David L. Cohn United States
Robert G. Petersdorf United States
José A. Vázquez United States
Philippe Vanhems France
Peter Rohner relative to Hung-Jen Tang Taiwan Hung-Jen Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Hung-Jen Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Rohner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Rohner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Rohner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Rohner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Rohner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Rohner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Rohner. The network helps show where Peter Rohner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Rohner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Rohner Line = papers co-authored together Peter Rohner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 164 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007503
2 2003180
3 2012140
4 2002122
5 2010122
6 1990121
7 2000114
8 2010109
9 1991109
10 2003101
11 2000100
12 199796
13 199695
14 200993
15 200486
16 199776
17
Quantitative cultures of biopsy specimens from cutaneous cellulitis.
198976
18 200372
19 199672
20 201171

About Peter Rohner

Peter Rohner is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Management Information Systems, Clinical Biochemistry, Epidemiology and Health Information Management, having authored 164 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (20 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (17 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (16 papers), Information Technology Governance and Strategy (11 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (11 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (11 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (10 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (333 citations), Microbiology (103 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (629 citations), Molecular Medicine (390 citations) and Infectious Diseases (1.4k citations). Peter Rohner has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Raymond Auckenthaler, Stéphan Harbarth, Tobias Mettler, Didier Pittet, Daniel Lew, Vandack Alencar Nobre Junior, Jérôme Pugin, Jean‐Daniel Graf, Jorge Garbino and Robert Winter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact