Peter Redfield

30 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Redfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Anthropology 287
  • Geography, Planning and Development 133
  • Sociology and Political Science 913
  • Development 70
  • Business and International Management 32
Replace Jeff Corntassel with:
Jeff Corntassel Canada
Adriana Petryna United States
Henrik Vigh Denmark
Misty L. Bastian United States
Allen Isaacman United States
Didier Fassin France
Jon P. Mitchell United Kingdom
Carolyn Nordstrom United States
Luise White United States
Miriam Ticktin United States
Peter Redfield relative to Jeff Corntassel Canada Jeff Corntassel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jeff Corntassel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Redfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Redfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Redfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Redfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Redfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Redfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Redfield. The network helps show where Peter Redfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter Redfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Redfield Line = papers co-authored together Peter Redfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005271
2 2013232
3
Forces of compassion : humanitarianism between ethics and politics
2011223
4 2012124
5 2006119
6 2012107
7 200295
8 201591
9 200080
10 200252
11 200438
12 200024
13 201622
14 199621
15 200219
16 200216
17 20126
18 20125
19 20135
20 20005

About Peter Redfield

Peter Redfield is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Anthropology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers), Space exploration and regulation (3 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (2 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (287 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (133 citations), Sociology and Political Science (913 citations), Development (70 citations) and Business and International Management (32 citations). Peter Redfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Erica Bornstein, Marta María Maldonado, Steven Robins, Izumi Sakamoto, Michael E. Zimmerman, Margot Badran, John Charles Chasteen, Emma Kowal, Emily Yates‐Doerr and Sharon Abramowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Social Studies of Science, American Ethnologist, Cultural Anthropology, Public Culture and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact