Peter R. Gilbert

457 citations
6 papers · 178 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Peter R. Gilbert

5 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers

Peter R. Gilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Statistics and Probability 56
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 33
  • Ophthalmology 37
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 46
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 32
Replace Zoraida Corte with:
Zoraida Corte Spain
Garry John United Kingdom
Stephen F. Hobbiger United Kingdom
Lisa Pennells United Kingdom
Mayur Sarangdhar United States
Raashda A. Sulaiman Saudi Arabia
Olivier J. David United Kingdom
Kévin Duarte France
Lana Yin Hui Lai United Kingdom
Danielle Rasooly United States
Peter R. Gilbert relative to Zoraida Corte Spain Zoraida Corte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37×
Zoraida Corte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter R. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter R. Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter R. Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter R. Gilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter R. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter R. Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter R. Gilbert. The network helps show where Peter R. Gilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Peter R. Gilbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter R. Gilbert Line = papers co-authored together Peter R. Gilbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About Peter R. Gilbert

Peter R. Gilbert is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Ophthalmology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (56 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (33 citations), Ophthalmology (37 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (46 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (32 citations). Peter R. Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Patricia A. Cleary, Roy W. Beck, Jye‐Yu C. Backlund, David J. Kenny, John M. Lachin, Max Halperin, Bruce V. Stadel, Valery T. Miller, Diane B. Stoy and Bruce Levin. Their work appears in journals such as Controlled Clinical Trials, Contraception, Clinical Trials, Pediatric Neurology and Biometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact