Peter Purdue

32 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Peter Purdue
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Management Information Systems 184
  • Mathematical Physics 120
  • Statistics and Probability 101
  • Management Science and Operations Research 125
  • Transportation 44
Replace Zhenting Hou with:
Zhenting Hou China
Boris Alexandrovich Sevast'yanov Russia
Richard H. Stockbridge United States
Vladimir V. Anisimov United Kingdom
V. S. Korolyuk Ukraine
Władysław Szczotka Poland
Junping Li China
Robert Cogburn United States
Stella Kapodistria Netherlands
Sherif I. Ammar Egypt
Peter Purdue relative to Zhenting Hou China Zhenting Hou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Zhenting Hou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Purdue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Purdue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Purdue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Purdue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Purdue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Purdue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Purdue. The network helps show where Peter Purdue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Purdue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Purdue Line = papers co-authored together Peter Purdue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197466
2 198658
3 197431
4 198427
5 197426
6 197425
7 197724
8 197517
9 197415
10 197514
11 198611
12 197511
13 19779
14 19819
15 19738
16 19818
17 19737
18 19777
19 19817
20 19815

About Peter Purdue

Peter Purdue is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability and Applied Mathematics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (13 papers), Probability and Risk Models (11 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (9 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (4 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (4 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (2 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers) and Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (184 citations), Mathematical Physics (120 citations), Statistics and Probability (101 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (125 citations) and Transportation (44 citations). Peter Purdue has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Colm Art O’Cinneide, J. Gani, Marcel F. Neuts, Z. Govindarajulu, William S. Griffith, A. Rényi, Richard J. Kryscio and Jon Gani. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Journal of Applied Probability, Advances in Applied Probability, Journal of the American Statistical Association and Operations Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact