Peter Proctor

20 papers receiving 807 citations

Peers

Peter Proctor
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Cell Biology 224
  • Sensory Systems 47
  • Biochemistry 44
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 110
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 125
Replace Philip Manning with:
Philip Manning United Kingdom
P.R. Crippa Italy
Mihai Radu Romania
Susan N. Marshall New Zealand
Yubo Wu China
Thomas Aberle Germany
Jia Xu China
Xiaoyan Wu China
Milena De Nicola Italy
Junjie Luo China
Peter Proctor relative to Philip Manning United Kingdom Philip Manning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Philip Manning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Proctor. The network helps show where Peter Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Peter Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Proctor Line = papers co-authored together Peter Proctor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974350
2 199698
3 197087
4 198283
5
Free radicals and disease in man.
198468
6 197362
7 197437
8 196819
9
Electron-transfer factors in psychosis and dyskinesia.
197214
10 199212
11 198012
12 19916
13 19705
14
A superoxide-producing system in the conjunctival mucus thread.
19774
15
Effect of dose schedule of vitamin E and hydroxethylruticide on intestinal toxicity induced by adriamycin.
19864
16 19714
17 19703
18 19782
19 19702
20 19891

About Peter Proctor

Peter Proctor is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Cell Biology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (2 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (1 paper), Color Science and Applications (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (1 paper), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (1 paper) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (224 citations), Sensory Systems (47 citations), Biochemistry (44 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (110 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (125 citations). Peter Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John McGinness, Peter M. Corry, Edward S. Reynolds, Evelyn Tiffany‐Castiglioni, Menachem Shoham, J. Regino Perez‐Polo, Russell P. Saneto, Robert C. Blake, S.E. Ealick and Alan M. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Journal of Molecular Biology, Biochemical Pharmacology and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact