Peter Procopis

1.4k citations
20 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Procopis

20 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Peter Procopis
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Clinical Biochemistry 135
  • Neurology 177
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 161
  • Biochemistry 63
  • Genetics 194
Replace Roshan Lal Koul with:
Roshan Lal Koul Oman
Michael Freilinger Austria
Kihei Maekawa Japan
Sedat Işıkay Türkiye
Sophie Calvert Australia
Biswaroop Chakrabarty India
Vrajesh P. Udani India
Anthony E.G. Tannenberg Australia
Huang-Tsung Kuo Taiwan
George A. Jervis United States
Peter Procopis relative to Roshan Lal Koul Oman Roshan Lal Koul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Roshan Lal Koul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Procopis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Procopis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Procopis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Procopis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Procopis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Procopis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Procopis. The network helps show where Peter Procopis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Procopis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Procopis Line = papers co-authored together Peter Procopis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2013182
2 2015108
3 1988100
4 197591
5 199984
6 201571
7 201971
8 198168
9 201861
10 201349
11 199142
12 202041
13 199840
14 200717
15 199316
16 202311
17 19828
18 19858
19 20196
20 20214

About Peter Procopis

Peter Procopis is a scholar working on Neurology, Clinical Biochemistry, Ophthalmology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis (2 papers), Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper) and Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (135 citations), Neurology (177 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (161 citations), Biochemistry (63 citations) and Genetics (194 citations). Peter Procopis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Padraic J. Grattan‐Smith, Michael Fairley, James Camakaris, David M. Danks, Creswell J Eastman, John H. Casey, GILLIAN M. TURNER, B Turner, Russell Clive Dale and Jayne Henly Antony. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Brain, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Archives of Disease in Childhood and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact