Peter N. Gates

631 citations
57 papers · 474 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peter N. Gates

53 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Peter N. Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 132
  • Inorganic Chemistry 181
  • Organic Chemistry 230
  • Filtration and Separation 16
  • Spectroscopy 118
Replace Jacqueline Potier with:
Jacqueline Potier France
G. Innorta Italy
E. L. Wagner United States
Frank Klanberg Germany
H. J. Berthold Germany
Dinko Tuhtar North Macedonia
E. E. Tucker United States
R. E. Gerkin United States
Daniel Stasko United States
R. G. Kidd Canada
Peter N. Gates relative to Jacqueline Potier France Jacqueline Potier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jacqueline Potier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter N. Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter N. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter N. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter N. Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter N. Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter N. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter N. Gates. The network helps show where Peter N. Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter N. Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter N. Gates Line = papers co-authored together Peter N. Gates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196735
2 196532
3 196827
4 197226
5 196919
6 199919
7 198018
8 199118
9 199716
10 198214
11 199113
12 198613
13 199112
14 198412
15 197112
16 197211
17 199611
18 198811
19 196810
20 197410

About Peter N. Gates

Peter N. Gates is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 57 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (21 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (15 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (12 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (9 papers), Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (9 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (9 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (9 papers) and Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (132 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (181 citations), Organic Chemistry (230 citations), Filtration and Separation (16 citations) and Spectroscopy (118 citations). Peter N. Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur Finch, E.F. Mooney, Alan Muir, D. Steele, H.A. Willis, H. Donald Brooke Jenkins, Keith B. Dillon, Andrew N. Fitch, F. F. Bentley and Michael Stephens. Their work appears in journals such as Polyhedron, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, Thermochimica Acta, Inorganic Chemistry and Inorganica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact