Peter Mottishaw

511 citations
16 papers · 375 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Mottishaw

15 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Peter Mottishaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Condensed Matter Physics 250
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 183
  • Mathematical Physics 53
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 64
  • Statistics and Probability 27
Replace N S Skantzos with:
N S Skantzos Belgium
Véronique Gayrard France
W. K. Theumann Brazil
O. V. Usatenko Ukraine
Carlos Pérez-Espigares Spain
A. Yu. Tretyakov Japan
Fernando L. Metz Brazil
Antonio Auffinger United States
Mario Casartelli Italy
Wei-Kuo Chen United States
Peter Mottishaw relative to N S Skantzos Belgium N S Skantzos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
N S Skantzos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Mottishaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Mottishaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Mottishaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Mottishaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Mottishaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Mottishaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Mottishaw. The network helps show where Peter Mottishaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Mottishaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Mottishaw Line = papers co-authored together Peter Mottishaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1987115
2 198751
3 198743
4 198539
5 198735
6 198722
7 198622
8 198815
9 19889
10 19868
11 19887
12 19875
13 20232
14 20221
15 19871
16 20240

About Peter Mottishaw

Peter Mottishaw is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Economics and Econometrics, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (14 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (7 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (5 papers), Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (3 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (3 papers), Quantum many-body systems (2 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers) and Random Matrices and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (250 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (183 citations), Mathematical Physics (53 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (64 citations) and Statistics and Probability (27 citations). Peter Mottishaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include C. De Dominicis, Bernard Derrida, E. Gardner, David C. Sherrington, Roderick C. Dewar, K. Y. Michael Wong, J. R. L. de Almeida and Véronique Gayrard. Their work appears in journals such as Europhysics Letters (EPL), Comptes Rendus Physique, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Lecture notes in physics and Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact