Peter Moore

2.8k citations
63 papers · 1.8k · 1 hit paper · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Moore

60 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peter Moore's Hit Papers

Introducing the CTA concept 2013 · 468 citations
4680+4+8Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Peter Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 459
  • Atmospheric Science 539
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 347
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 352
  • Instrumentation 44
Replace Xiaohui Sun with:
Xiaohui Sun China
Keran O'Brien United States
Guiyun Jin China
Jonathan Peter Merrison Denmark
Breanna A. Binder United States
Jim McElwaine United Kingdom
Christine Gruber Germany
Siqi Zhang China
Fabio Marzaioli Italy
Toshiyuki Kobayashi Japan
Peter Moore relative to Xiaohui Sun China Xiaohui Sun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Xiaohui Sun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Moore. The network helps show where Peter Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Moore Line = papers co-authored together Peter Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Introducing the CTA concept
Hit paper breakdown →
2013468
2 1979173
3 1982152
4 200398
5 200597
6 200284
7 201481
8 201060
9 200757
10 198748
11 202048
12 200839
13 198036
14 201732
15 201829
16 201921
17 198719
18 200518
19 201016
20 201115

About Peter Moore

Peter Moore is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Atmospheric Science, Instrumentation, Soil Science and Ecology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryospheric studies and observations (17 papers), Landslides and related hazards (16 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (8 papers), Climate change and permafrost (8 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (7 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (6 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (459 citations), Atmospheric Science (539 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (347 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (352 citations) and Instrumentation (44 citations). Peter Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Bernard S. Strauss, Neal R. Iverson, Denis Cohen, Daphna Sagher, Thomas S. Hooyer, Samuel D. Rabkin, Miriam Jackson, Urs H. Fischer, Jack Kohler and Gaute Lappegard. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Glaciology, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms and Geology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact