Peter Melzer

772 citations
27 papers · 670 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Melzer

25 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers

Peter Melzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Developmental Neuroscience 50
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 307
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 205
  • Sensory Systems 34
  • Neurology 47
Replace Jenny C. Roberts with:
Jenny C. Roberts United Kingdom
Jan J. Dekker Netherlands
Ara Kocharyan Canada
James S. McCasland United States
P. Landry Canada
Joanne K. Morse United States
Masanori Uemura‐Sumi Japan
Catherine G. Cusick United States
David L. Deupree United States
Christine Huchzermeyer Germany
Peter Melzer relative to Jenny C. Roberts United Kingdom Jenny C. Roberts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Jenny C. Roberts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Melzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Melzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Melzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Melzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Melzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Melzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Melzer. The network helps show where Peter Melzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Melzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Melzer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Melzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199284
2 198580
3 200173
4 199459
5 199754
6 200137
7 200331
8 200030
9 200629
10 198428
11 200628
12 199424
13 199822
14 199718
15 199517
16 200115
17 19938
18 19988
19 19927
20 20017

About Peter Melzer

Peter Melzer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Neurology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (50 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (307 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (205 citations), Sensory Systems (34 citations) and Neurology (47 citations). Peter Melzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Egbert Welker, Hendrik Van der Loos, Carolyn Beebe Smith, Heinz Steiner, Ford F. Ebner, Louis Sokoloff, Joseph Dörfl, James A. McKanna, David R. Pickens and Victoria L. Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, European Journal of Neuroscience, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology and Visual Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact