Peter Meade

1.9k citations
27 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Meade

27 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Meade
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 348
  • Emergency Medicine 360
  • Nephrology 62
  • Surgery 355
  • Emergency Medical Services 45
Replace Scott R. Gunn with:
Scott R. Gunn United States
Robert F. Tamburro United States
Christopher C. Lee United States
C. Anne Morrison United States
Chad M. Thorson United States
Michael C. Plewa United States
J Pillgram-Larsen Norway
Edward E. Conway United States
Benan Bayrakçı Türkiye
Carlos Morales Colombia
Peter Meade relative to Scott R. Gunn United States Scott R. Gunn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Scott R. Gunn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Meade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Meade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Meade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Meade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Meade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Meade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Meade. The network helps show where Peter Meade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Meade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Meade Line = papers co-authored together Peter Meade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995263
2 2010167
3 1994138
4 1993132
5 199470
6 201264
7 201358
8 200955
9 200035
10 198034
11
Evaluation of a comprehensive algorithm for blunt and penetrating thoracic and abdominal trauma.
199133
12 201230
13 200430
14 201526
15 201320
16 201319
17 201717
18 200616
19 20129
20 20139

About Peter Meade

Peter Meade is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (9 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (348 citations), Emergency Medicine (360 citations), Nephrology (62 citations), Surgery (355 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (45 citations). Peter Meade has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Uganda and Spain. Frequent co-authors include William C. Shoemaker, Juan Duchesne, Norman E. McSwain, Michael Bishop, Frank Kennedy, PAUL L. APPEL, Harry B. Kram, H. Gill Cryer, Lance Stuke and Alan B. Marr. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, The American Surgeon, Critical Care Medicine, Journal of the American College of Surgeons and Journal of Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact