Peter McDonough

959 citations
33 papers · 480 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter McDonough

30 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Peter McDonough
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Political Science and International Relations 293
  • Communication 60
  • Public Administration 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 219
  • General Social Sciences 13
Replace Heinrich Best with:
Heinrich Best Germany
Max Pensky United States
Julia Resnik Israel
Benjamín Arditi Mexico
Corey Robin United States
Peter G. Mandaville United Kingdom
Hugo Young United Kingdom
Peter Augustine Lawler United States
Marc Guinjoan Spain
Lyndi Hewitt United States
Peter McDonough relative to Heinrich Best Germany Heinrich Best's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Heinrich Best · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter McDonough

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter McDonough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter McDonough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter McDonough more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter McDonough

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter McDonough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter McDonough. The network helps show where Peter McDonough may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter McDonough, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter McDonough Line = papers co-authored together Peter McDonough links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198566
2 198653
3 199847
4 199839
5 198130
6 198726
7 198323
8 198419
9 198719
10 198117
11 199316
12 199415
13 198615
14 199914
15 199514
16 19869
17 19829
18 19828
19 19827
20 19886

About Peter McDonough

Peter McDonough is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Strategy and Management and Philosophy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (4 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (3 papers), Political Systems and Governance (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and Spanish Culture and Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (293 citations), Communication (60 citations), Public Administration (23 citations), Sociology and Political Science (219 citations) and General Social Sciences (13 citations). Peter McDonough has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Samuel H. Barnes, Antonio López Pina, Doh Chull Shin, José Álvaro Moisés, Andrew M. Greeley, Robert D. Crassweller, Thomas C. Bruneau, Kiren Aziz Chaudhry, Rollie E. Poppino and Philippe Faucher. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, American Political Science Review, Population and Development Review, American Journal of Political Science and Economic Development and Cultural Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact