Peter Markl

418 citations
29 papers · 356 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
    • Analytical chemistry methods development
    • Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Papers in

Peter Markl

26 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Peter Markl
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Spectroscopy 147
  • Analytical Chemistry 91
  • Filtration and Separation 8
  • Transplantation 12
  • Immunology and Allergy 11
Replace Michael T. Combs with:
Michael T. Combs United States
Sidsel Thelander Sweden
Eugene P. Kroeff United States
Kanenobu Kubo Japan
John R. Stillian United States
Jerome F. Deye United States
Minhui Ma Canada
Andrea Weston United States
S. G. Perry Netherlands
T.-I. Lin Taiwan
Peter Markl relative to Michael T. Combs United States Michael T. Combs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Michael T. Combs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Markl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Markl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Markl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Markl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Markl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Markl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Markl. The network helps show where Peter Markl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Peter Markl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Markl Line = papers co-authored together Peter Markl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200146
2 200141
3 198433
4 200032
5 199730
6 200327
7 199021
8 200121
9 198317
10 196313
11
Extraktion und Extraktions-Chromatographie in der Anorganischen Analytik
197210
12 197510
13 198910
14 19819
15 19959
16 19634
17 19684
18 19814
19 19783
20 20063

About Peter Markl

Peter Markl is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Radiation and Filtration and Separation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (17 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (8 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (8 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (2 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (2 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (1 paper) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (147 citations), Analytical Chemistry (91 citations), Filtration and Separation (8 citations), Transplantation (12 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (11 citations). Peter Markl has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Poland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Margit Cichna‐Markl, Josef F. K. Huber, Maria Pawłowska, Dietmar Knopp, Reinhard Nießner, Mathias M. Müller, F. Hecht, Snežana Marković, Andrea Griesmacher and Mathias M. Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Microchimica Acta, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Chromatographia, Journal of Chromatography A and Clinica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact