Peter Margl

3.3k citations
48 papers · 3.0k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Margl

48 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Peter Margl
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 810
  • Organic Chemistry 2.1k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 1.0k
  • Catalysis 257
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 192
Replace Cynthia K. Schauer with:
Cynthia K. Schauer United States
Pavel A. Dub United States
Kumar Vanka India
Laurent Lefort Netherlands
Natalie Fey United Kingdom
Hoseop Yun South Korea
Heikki M. Tuononen Finland
Shuqiang Niu United States
María Besora Spain
Craig M. Robertson United Kingdom
Peter Margl relative to Cynthia K. Schauer United States Cynthia K. Schauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Cynthia K. Schauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Margl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Margl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Margl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Margl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Margl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Margl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Margl. The network helps show where Peter Margl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Margl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Margl Line = papers co-authored together Peter Margl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997314
2 1997187
3 1997176
4 2004175
5 1999146
6 1996135
7 1998134
8 1998116
9 1996115
10 1997108
11 1998106
12 2002105
13 199995
14 199693
15 199865
16 199963
17 199562
18 199962
19 199661
20 199847

About Peter Margl

Peter Margl is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Process Chemistry and Technology, Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 48 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (20 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (18 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (13 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (7 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (7 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (7 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (5 papers) and Machine Learning in Materials Science (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (810 citations), Organic Chemistry (2.1k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (1.0k citations), Catalysis (257 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (192 citations). Peter Margl has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Ziegler, Liqun Deng, Tom K. Woo, Peter E. Blöchl, Luigi Cavallo, John C. W. Lohrenz, Karlheinz Schwarz, Michael Seth, Peter E. Bloechl and Wolfgang Linert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Organometallics, The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A and Catalysis Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact