Peter M. Alexander

437 citations
6 papers · 81 · h-index 2

Impact in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science
    • History of Science and Medicine
    • Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
  • Philosophy top 10%
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought

Papers in

Journals
Notes (1 paper)The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)
Partner nations
United Kingdom

In The Last Decade

Peter M. Alexander

3 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers

Peter M. Alexander
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • History and Philosophy of Science 38
  • Philosophy 20
  • Anthropology 15
  • History 10
  • Classics 2
Replace Joseph Glanvill with:
Joseph Glanvill
Ira O. Wade
A. H. T. Levi United States
Peter France United Kingdom
J.M.M.H. Thijssen Netherlands
Theo Verbeek Netherlands
Wilhelm Schmidt‐Biggemann Germany
Henry More
Émile Bréhier
John P. Doyle United States
Peter M. Alexander relative to Joseph Glanvill Joseph Glanvill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joseph Glanvill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. Alexander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. Alexander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. Alexander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. Alexander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. Alexander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. Alexander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. Alexander. The network helps show where Peter M. Alexander may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Peter M. Alexander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter M. Alexander Line = papers co-authored together Peter M. Alexander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
The works of the honourable Robert Boyle
199977
2 19583
3
The Dictionary of Eighteenth Century Philosophers
19991
4
The chamber music of Franz Danzi : sources, chronology and style
19860
5 19970
6
Marianna Martines: A Woman Composer in the Vienna of Mozart and Haydn
20100

About Peter M. Alexander

Peter M. Alexander is a scholar working on Music, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 6 papers that have together received 81 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (38 citations), Philosophy (20 citations), Anthropology (15 citations), History (10 citations) and Classics (2 citations). Peter M. Alexander has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Boyle. Their work appears in journals such as Notes, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact